United States v. Van Duzee
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- United States v. Converse (7th Cir. 1894)
- Hallett v. United States (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts 1894)
- Van Duzee v. United States (District Court, N.D. Iowa 1891)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
Upon a reconsideration of the seventh paragraph of our opinion in this case, we have come to the conclusion that the item for.entering the orders for trial, and recording the verdict should be allowed. We think the docket fee of three dollars was intended to cover the entry of the case upon the *200 docket, indexing the same, making cotemporaneous minutes and entries upon the docket or calendar and such1 other incidental services as are not' covered by other clauses of the statute. Where, however, the entry is not a mere memorandum, but' requires to be made part of a permanent record, it is a proper subject for a charge per folio.
The item- in this- case was properly allowed by the court btelow as for “ making a record.”
The opinion in the above case will be varied to this extent.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.