Supreme Court of the United States, 1892

Cincinnati Safe & Lock Co. v. Grand Rapids Safety Deposit Co.

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 31, 1892

146 U.S. 54; 13 S. Ct. 13; 36 L. Ed. 885; 1892 U.S. LEXIS 2173 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Cha/rles B. WiTby and Mr. Gusta/vus 3. Wald for the motion., Mr. John, F. Follett and Mr. T. 3. Kelley, opposing.

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Carriere & Son v. United States (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan 1908)
Scott v. Hamner (8th Cir. 1896)
Lutcher v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1895)
Voorhees v. John T. Noye Manufacturing Co. (Supreme Court of the United States 1894)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

The Chief Justice:

Judgment was rendered in this case by the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio on April 25,1891. An entry was made of record, June 19, 1891, that the court “ allows a writ of error to the Supreme Court of the United States, with stay of execution, upon the filing of a supersedeas bond,” as described, and such a bond was filed and approved June 20, 1891. A petition for the allowance of the writ of error and an assignment of errors were filed in the clerk’s office of the Circuit Court, July 3, 1891, and the writ of error bears test' and was, filed in that office on that day, and a citation to the adverse party signed and served.

The motion to dismiss must be sustained upon the authority of Wauton v. De Wolf, 142 U. S. 138 ; Brooks v. Norris, 11 How. 204; Credit Co. v. Arkansas Central Railway Co., 128 U. S. 258, and cases cited.

Writ of error dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.