Supreme Court of the United States, 1893

In re Schneider

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 14, 1893

148 U.S. 162 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Jeremiah M. Wilson, Mr. William F. Mattingly and Mr. A. A. Iloehling, Jr., for the petitioner. '

Cases that cite this one

14 later published cases cite this decision.

Edmondson v. Brady (Md. 1947)
Dorsey v. Gill (D.C. Cir. 1945)
Dorsey v. Gill (D.C. Cir. 1945)
Fowler v. Grimes (Ga. 1944)
In re Blades (Idaho 1939)
Friedberg v. United States (5th Cir. 1934)
Patton v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1930)
Brown v. White (8th Cir. 1928)
Harlan v. McGourin (Supreme Court of the United States 1910)
In re Eckart (Supreme Court of the United States 1897)
Bradshaw v. Earnshaw (D.C. Cir. 1897)
Gonzales v. Cunningham (Supreme Court of the United States 1896)
In re Chapman (Supreme Court of the United States 1895)
In re Belt (Supreme Court of the United States 1895)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

The Chief Justice:

Leave to file petition for writs, of . habeas corpus and certiorari is denied. • The ground, of the application does not go to the jurisdiction or authority of the Supreme Court of the District, and' mere error cannot be reviewed in this proceeding. Ex parte Parks, 93 U. S. 18; Ex parte Bigelow, 113 U. S. 328; Ex parte Wilson, 114 U. S. 417; Nielsen, Petitioner, 131 U. S. 176.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.