Supreme Court of the United States, 1894

Covington & Cincinnati Elevated Railroad v. Kentucky

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided May 26, 1894 · Ante, Brown, Field, Fuller, Gray, Kentucky, Reasons, Reversal, White

154 U.S. 224 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. William H. Jackson, (with whom was -Mr. W. H. Wadsworth on the brief,) for plaintiff in error., Mr. William J. Hendrick, Attorney General of the State of Kentucky, and Mr. William Ooébél for defendant in error.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Covington & Cincinnati Elevated Railroad & Transfer & Bridge Co. v. Kentucky (Supreme Court of the United States 1894)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice- Brown

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case differs from the last only in the fact that the plaintiff in error was not incorporated until 1886, and subsequently to a general law of the State declaring that all charters and grants of or to corporations shall be subject to amendment or repeal at the will of the legislature. Conceding that these words became a part of its charter, and hence that no contract was impaired by the legislation of 1890, such legislation is still open to the objection found to exist in the former case, that it is m conflict with the interstate commerce clause of the Constitution.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals of Kentucky is, therefore,

Reversed, and the case remanded to that court for further proceedings.

Mr. Chief Justice Fuller, Mr. Justice Field, Mr. Justice Gray, and Mr. Justice White concurred in the judgment of reversal, for -the like reasons as'in the'case of Covington Bridge v. Kentucky, ante, 204, 223.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.