Supreme Court of the United States, 1894

Rowe v. Phelps

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 5, 1894 · Brown

152 U.S. 87; 14 S. Ct. 632; 38 L. Ed. 365; 1894 U.S. LEXIS 2096 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. M. L. Crawford, for plaintiff in error, submitted on his brief., Mr. Leigh Robinson for defendant in error.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Bailey v. Block (District Court, District of Columbia 1937)
Hanson v. C. B. & Q. R. R. (Wyo. 1923)
Bernard v. Lea (4th Cir. 1913)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Me. Justice Brown,

after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

There is no assignment of errors sent up with the record in this case, as required by Bev. Stat. § 997, and no “ specification of the errors relied upon,” as required by Bule 21 of this court. This rule requires that the specification “ shall set out separately and particularly each' error assigned and intended to be urged,” and there is no such “plain error not assigned or specified,” as calls upon the court to exercise its option to review the questions involved. It would seem that unless the statute and rule are to be entirely disregarded, this writ of error must be

Dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.