Spalding v. Castro
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Precision Specialty Metals, Inc. v. United States (United States Court of International Trade 2000)
- Leonard Martin Const. Co. v. Highbarger (6th Cir. 1909)
- King v. McLean Asylum of the Massachusetts General Hospital (1st Cir. 1894)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
delivered th,e opinion of the court.
This case is covered by that of the same person against Seeberger, collector, just decided. The tobacco was like that imported in the former case, and was likewise assessed. There was due protest by the importer, seasonable appeal to the Secretary of the Treasury, and, on his adverse ruling, a timely suit. The case wak tried by a jury. The court instructed the jury that if they believed from the evidence that the tobacco in question required to have labor expended upon it in order to fit it for consumption, then it was unmanufactured, tobacco, as claimed by the plaintiff, etc. Excepting to this ruling, the case was brought here. Whatever may have been the correctness of the instruction as a general proposition, it was correct when applied to the case in hand. Evanston v. Gunn, 99 U. S. 660. The judgment is
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.