This case differs from the preceding, in that the action was commenced March 21, 1889, and that Finan, the defendant, did not enter upon the tract in controversy until after the 1st of May, 1888. His entry and occupation gave him no rights to the -land, because it was embraced within the railroad grant of 1856. He took nothing under the confirmatory act of 1889, because he was not a bona fide claimant or in actual occupation on the 1st of May, 1888. The land was selected and certified to the State for the benefit of the canal company, and was within the scope of the confirmation to the company by the’ act of 1889. The title of the company was, therefore, perfect as against him. The judgment of the Circuit Court must, therefore, be

Reversed, and the case remanded.for a new trial.