In Re Robertson
In Re Robertson
Opinion
after stating the case, delivered • the opinion of the court.
Applications to this court for a writ of error to a state court are not entertained unless at the request of one of the members of the court concurred in by his associates. In this case there seems to' have been some misunderstanding on the part of counsel as to the practice, in view of Avhich, and considering that this is a capital case and thát the day appointed for the *185 execution of the sentence is very near, we have examined the application, and are of opinion that the question of the sufficiency of the indictment is not a Federal question, and that no Federal question appears upon the record to have been presented to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia, and therefore, upon the authority of Leeper v. Texas. 139 U. S. 462, and Duncan v. Missouri, 152 U. S. 377,
The writ of error is not allowed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- In Re ROBERTSON, Petitioner
- Cited By
- 6 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Applications to this court for a writ of error to a state court are not entertained unless at the request of .a member of the court, concurred in by his associates. The decision of the highest court of a State that it was competent under an indictment for murder simply, to try and convict a person of murder in the first degree if the homicide was perpetrated in the commission of or attempt to commit robbery, presents no Federal question for consideration. When the record in a case brought here from the highest court of a State by writ of error discloses no Federal question as decided by that court, there is nothing in the case for this court tó consider.