In re Robertson
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- Ex parte Ceja (District Court, D. Nevada 1931)
- Veneziano v. State (Neb. 1941)
- Chadek v. State (Neb. 1940)
- Hayes v. Administrator, Veterans Administration (Okla. 1975)
- United States v. McIntosh (District Court, E.D. Virginia 1932)
- Thomas v. Carlton Ex Rel. Special Road & Bridge District Number One (Fla. 1932)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
after stating the case, delivered • the opinion of the court.
Applications to this court for a writ of error to a state court are not entertained unless at the request of one of the members of the court concurred in by his associates. In this case there seems to' have been some misunderstanding on the part of counsel as to the practice, in view of Avhich, and considering that this is a capital case and thát the day appointed for the *185 execution of the sentence is very near, we have examined the application, and are of opinion that the question of the sufficiency of the indictment is not a Federal question, and that no Federal question appears upon the record to have been presented to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia, and therefore, upon the authority of Leeper v. Texas. 139 U. S. 462, and Duncan v. Missouri, 152 U. S. 377,
The writ of error is not allowed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.