Supreme Court of the United States, 1895

Neel v. Pennsylvania Co.

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 11, 1895 · The Chief Justice Stated the Case

157 U.S. 153; 15 S. Ct. 589; 39 L. Ed. 654; 1895 U.S. LEXIS 2185 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Marius Miriam for plaintiff in error., No appearance for defendant in error.

Cases that cite this one

19 later published cases cite this decision.

Wenger v. Western Reserve Life Assur. Co. of Ohio (District Court, M.D. Tennessee 1983)
Citizens & Southern National Bank v. Auer (District Court, E.D. Tennessee 1977)
Congress Of Racial Equality v. Bryan Clemmons (5th Cir. 1963)
Congress of Racial Equality v. Clemmons (5th Cir. 1963)
Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Ry. & Motor Coach Employees of America, Division No. 1127 v. Southern Bus Lines, Inc (5th Cir. 1951)
Gerstman v. Poole (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 1950)
Meyer v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. (District Court, S.D. New York 1935)
Cowell v. Ducas (District Court, S.D. New York 1932)
Doidge v. Cunard S. S. Co. (1st Cir. 1927)
Borough of Du Bois v. Pancoast (3d Cir. 1914)
Phœnix-Buttes Gold Mining Co. v. Winstead (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 1914)
O'Conner v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. (Iowa 1909)
Yeandle v. Pennsylvania R. Co. (3d Cir. 1909)
Dinet v. City of Delavan (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin 1902)
Robinson v. Attapulgus Clay Co. (Ga. Ct. App. 1937)
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Willard (Supreme Court of the United States 1911)
Thompson v. Southern Railway Co. (N.C. 1902)
Green v. Heaston (Ind. 1900)
Guarantee Co. of North America v. First National Bank of Lynchburg (Va. 1898)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

The Chief Justice

stated the case, and said: On the authority of Grace v. American Central Insurance Co., 109 U. S. 278, 288, 284; Continental Insuramce Co. v. Rhoads, 119 U. S. 237; and Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway v. Swan, 111 U. S. 379, 388, the. judgment of the Circuit Court will be reversed, with instructions to remand the case to the state court with costó against defendant in error, which must also pay the costs in this court. Hamrick v. Hamrick, 153 U. S. 192, 198.

Judgment reversed accordingly.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.