Supreme Court of the United States, 1895

California v. Holladay

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided November 11, 1895 · The Chief Justice:

159 U.S. 415; 16 S. Ct. 53; 40 L. Ed. 202; 1895 U.S. LEXIS 2308 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. 8. W\\ Holladay in person, and Mr. F. Burhe Holladay for the motion., Mr. W. F. Fitsgerald, Attorney General of the State of California, Mr. William Matthews, and Mr. William Craig opposing.

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Young v. Miami Beach Improvement Co. (Fla. 1950)
Boehringer v. Yuma County (Ariz. 1914)
Jones v. Vane (Supreme Court of the United States 1906)
Richards v. Chase Elevator Co. (Supreme Court of the United States 1895)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

The Chief Justice:

The opinions of the Supreme Court of California in this case are reported 68 California, 439; 93 California, 241; 102 California, 661. The motion to dismiss is sustained on the authority of San Francisco v. Itsell, 133 U. S. 65; Beatty v. Benton, 135 U. S. 244; Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; and cases cited. And see Hoadley v. San Francisco, 94 U. S. 4; Hoadley v. San Francisco, 124 U. S. 639.

Writ of error dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.