Supreme Court of the United States, 1896

National Accident Society v. Spiro

National Accident Society v. Spiro
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided November 30, 1896 · Brewer, Peokham
164 U.S. 281; 17 S. Ct. 996; 41 L. Ed. 435; 1896 U.S. LEXIS 1859 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. II. D. Me Burney for plaintiff in error., Mr. Henry II. Ingersoll for defendant in error.

National Accident Society v. Spiro

Cases that cite this one

9 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

The Chief Justice :

This is a certificate from the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth- Circuit, propounding, after a preliminary statement, the following question:

“ Does a defendant by filing a petition in a state court for removal of the cause to the United States court, in general terms, unaccompanied by a plea in abatement, and without specifying or restricting the purpose of his appearance, thereby waive objection to the jurisdiction of the court for' want of' sufficient service of the summons ? ”

For the reasons given and on the authorities cited in the case of Wabash Western Railway v. Brow, ante, 271, the question must be answered in the negative.

Certificate accordingly.

Mr. Justice Brewer and Mr. Justice Peokham dissented.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.