Supreme Court of the United States, 1897

Reaves v. Oliver

Reaves v. Oliver
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided November 1, 1897
168 U.S. 704; 18 S. Ct. 945; 42 L. Ed. 1212; 1897 U.S. LEXIS 1756 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Frank B. Crosthwaiie for plaintiff in error and appellant.

Reaves v. Oliver

Cases that cite this one

16 later published cases cite this decision. The 15 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Cuodam.

The order or decree sought to be reviewed was not final but interlocutory, and the writ of error and the appeal must be dismissed. Acts September 24,1789, c. 20, '§§ 13, 22,1 Stat. 81, 84; March 3, 1803, c. 40, 2 Stat.- 244; Rev. Stat. §§ 691, 692; Act March 3, 1891, c. 517, 26 Stat. 826; Forgay v. Conrad, 6 How. 201, 205 ; McLish v. Roff, 141 U. S. 661; American Construction Co. v. Jacksonville, Tampa &c. Railway, 148 *705U. S. 372, 378; Smith v. Vulcan Iron Works, 165 U. S. 518, 521.

Mr. Frank B. Crosthwaiie for plaintiff in error and appellant.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.