Supreme Court of the United States, 1898

Clark v. Fitzgerald

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided May 28, 1898 · Brewer

171 U.S. 92; 18 S. Ct. 941; 43 L. Ed. 87; 1898 U.S. LEXIS 1588 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Robert B. Smith for plaintiff in error. Mr. Robert L. Wood was on his brief., Mr. James W. Forbis for defendants in error.

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

Rhodes v. Rhodes (Alaska 1962)
Kinzel v. West Park Investment Corporation (Mo. 1959)
Anaconda Copper Min. Co. v. Pilot Butte Min. Co. (Mont. 1915)
State ex rel. Anaconda Copper Mining Co. v. District Court of the Second Judicial District (Mont. 1901)
Quilp Gold Mining Co. v. Republic Mines Corp. (Wash. 1917)
Ajax Gold Mining Co. v. Hilkey (Colo. 1903)
Parrot Silver & Copper Co. v. Heinze (Mont. 1901)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Mr. Justice Brewer

delivered the opinion of the court.

.The case is before us on error to the Supreme Court of Montana. It is unnecessary to state its facts in detail, and it is sufficient to say that the answer given to the fourth question in the opinion just filed in Del Monte Mining Co. v. Last Chance Mining Co., ante, 55, compels an affirmance of the judgment.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.