Supreme Court of the United States, 1900

Wright v. Columbus, Hocking Valley & Athens Railroad

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided February 26, 1900 · Brown

176 U.S. 481; 20 S. Ct. 398; 44 L. Ed. 554; 1900 U.S. LEXIS 1751 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. J. B. Foraker, Mr. T. E. Powell and Mr. D. J. Ryan, for plaintiffs in error., Mr. D. L. Sleeper, Mr. C. H. Grovenor and Mr. John J. Sloddart for defendant in error.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

State ex rel. Hunter v. Erickson (Ohio 1966)
State ex rel. Lynch v. Rhodes (Ohio 1964)
In re Yee Shee Dong (District Court, E.D. Michigan 1952)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Mr. Justice Brown

delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff insisted before the Supreme Court that he made the improvements on his mill with reference to the contract between the State and the Federal Government, but the Supreme Court was of opinion that he had no legal right to make investments on the faith of a contract between others to which he was not a party or privy, and insist for that reason the contract should be observed by either of the parties; that, so far as related to the contract between Worthington and the State, his remedy would be in damages for breach of the contract, and not an injunction against the company entering upon the lands purchased from the State in which he had no interest. The decree against him was therefore affirmed.

The Federal question set up in the assignment of errors was precisely the same as in the other cases, and the issues which arise from such assignments are the only ones called to our attention by counsel. The judgment of the Supreme Court is therefore

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.