Chrystal Springs Land & Water Co. v. Los Angeles
Supreme Court of the United States
Chrystal Springs Land & Water Co. v. Los Angeles, 177 U.S. 169 (1900)
20 S. Ct. 573; 44 L. Ed. 720; 1900 U.S. LEXIS 1782
The Chief Justice: Bill to Quiet Title to Certain Waters
Chrystal Springs Land & Water Co. v. Los Angeles
Opinion
■ Bill to quiet title to certain waters, water rights and works connected therewith. Bill dismissed for want of jurisdiction, and question of jurisdiction certified: Reported below, 82 Fed. Rep. 114; 76 Fed. Rep. 148.
Decree affirmed on authority of (1) Phillips v. Mound City Association, 124 U. S. 605; California Powder Works v. Davis, 151 U. S. 389, 395; New Orleans v. De Armas, 9 Peters, 224; Borgmeyer v. Idler, 159 U. S. 408; Muse v. Arlington Hotel Company, 168 U. S. 430. (2) Robinson v. Anderson, 121 U. S. 522; Florida Central Railroad v. Bell, 176 U. S. 321; Gold Washing Company v. Keyes, 96 U. S. 199; Tennessee v. Union and Planters' Bank, 152 U. S. 454; New Orleans v. Benjamin, 153 U. S. 411, 424.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Chrystal Springs Land and Water Company v. Los Angeles
- Cited By
- 14 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Decree below affirmed on the authori ,y of the cases named in the opinion of the court.