Supreme Court of the United States, 1900

Chrystal Springs Land & Water Co. v. Los Angeles

Chrystal Springs Land & Water Co. v. Los Angeles
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided April 9, 1900 · The Chief Justice: Bill to Quiet Title to Certain Waters
177 U.S. 169; 20 S. Ct. 573; 44 L. Ed. 720; 1900 U.S. LEXIS 1782 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. John Garber for appellants., Mr. Walter F. Haas for appellee. Mr. S. O. Houghton was on his brief.

Chrystal Springs Land & Water Co. v. Los Angeles

Cases that cite this one

11 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

The Chief Justice :

■ Bill to quiet title to certain waters, water rights and works connected therewith. Bill dismissed for want of jurisdiction, and question of jurisdiction certified: Reported below, 82 Fed. Rep. 114; 76 Fed. Rep. 148.

Decree affirmed on authority of (1) Phillips v. Mound City Association, 124 U. S. 605; California Powder Works v. Davis, 151 U. S. 389, 395; New Orleans v. De Armas, 9 Peters, 224; Borgmeyer v. Idler, 159 U. S. 408; Muse v. Arlington Hotel Company, 168 U. S. 430. (2) Robinson v. Anderson, 121 U. S. 522; Florida Central Railroad v. Bell, 176 U. S. 321; Gold Washing Company v. Keyes, 96 U. S. 199; Tennessee v. Union and Planters' Bank, 152 U. S. 454; New Orleans v. Benjamin, 153 U. S. 411, 424.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.