Supreme Court of the United States, 1901

Wormley v. District of Columbia

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided April 29, 1901 · OuriaM

181 U.S. 402; 21 S. Ct. 609; 45 L. Ed. 921; 1901 U.S. LEXIS 1374 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. D. W. Baker, Mr. John O. Qittings and Mr. Maloom Uufty_ for plaintiff in error., Mr. Andrew B. Duvall and Mr. Olarenee A. Brcmdenburg for defendant in error.

Cases that cite this one

8 later published cases cite this decision.

Bung's Bar & Grille, Inc. v. TP. COUNCIL OF FLORENCE (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1985)
Donaldson's Heirs v. City of New Orleans (La. 1927)
Palmer v. Mayor and Board of Aldermen (La. 1940)
Lyon v. Mayor C.C. of Hyattsville (Md. 1915)
Kettle v. City of Dallas (Tex. App. 1904)
Lanham & Sons Co. v. City of Rome (Ga. 1911)
Wilzinski v. City of Greenville (Miss. 1904)
Schaefer v. Werling (Supreme Court of the United States 1903)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per OuriaM.

And now, April 29, 1901. the judgments in the foregoing cases are affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Parsons v. District of Columbia, 170 U. S. 45, and French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co., ante, 324.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.