Armstrong v. United States
Cases that cite this one
36 later published cases cite this decision. The 24 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Jake King v. Honorable Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the Interior of the United States (D.C. Cir. 1975)
- In re Iraq and Afghanistan Detainees Litigation (District Court, District of Columbia 2007)
- Ali v. Pappas (D.C. Cir. 2007)
- Igartua-De-La-Rosa v. United States (1st Cir. 2005)
- Jose Gubiensio-Ortiz v. Al Kanahele, Warden, Metropolitan Correctional Center, San Diego, California, United States of America v. Raul Chavez-Sanchez (9th Cir. 1988)
- Yosh Sakamoto v. Duty Free Shoppers, Ltd. (9th Cir. 1985)
- Aurelius Inv., LLC v. Puerto Rico (1st Cir. 2019)
- United States v. Lebrón-Caceres (District Court, D. Puerto Rico 2016)
- Vidal v. Garcia-Padilla (District Court, D. Puerto Rico 2016)
- United States v. Mercado-Flores (District Court, D. Puerto Rico 2015)
- Fadi Maqaleh v. Chuck Hagel (D.C. Cir. 2013)
- Tuaua v. United States of America (District Court, District of Columbia 2013)
- United States v. Hamdan (United States Court of Military Commission Review 2011)
- Igartúa v. United States (1st Cir. 2011)
- Al Maqaleh v. Gates (D.C. Cir. 2010)
- Igartúa v. United States (1st Cir. 2010)
- People v. Clarke (Superior Court of The Virgin Islands 2010)
- People v. Milosavljevic (Superior Court of The Virgin Islands 2010)
- Al Maqaleh v. Gates (District Court, District of Columbia 2009)
- Consejo De Salud Playa De Ponce v. Rullan (District Court, D. Puerto Rico 2008)
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Boynes (Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands 2003)
- United States v. Pollard (District Court, Virgin Islands 2002)
- Romeu v. Cohen (2d Cir. 2001)
- Igartua De La Rosa v. United States (District Court, D. Puerto Rico 2000)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ARMSTRONG
v.
UNITED STATES.
Supreme Court of United States.
Mr. Alphonso Hart and Mr. John G. Carlisle for appellant. Mr. John C. Chaney and Mr. Charles C. Leeds were on Mr. Hart's brief.
Mr. Solicitor General and Mr. Attorney General for appellee.
*244 MR. JUSTICE BROWN delivered the opinion of the court.
This case is controlled by the case of Dooley v. United States, No. 501, just decided. So far as the duties were exacted upon goods imported prior to the ratification of the treaty of April 11, 1899, they were properly exacted. So far as they were imposed upon importations after that date and prior to December 5, 1899, plaintiff is entitled to recover them back.
The judgment of the Court of Claims is therefore reversed and the case remanded to that court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.