Supreme Court of the United States, 1903

Winston v. Winston

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided April 13, 1903

189 U.S. 506; 23 S. Ct. 852; 47 L. Ed. 922; 1903 U.S. LEXIS 1385 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Eugene Sweeney for plaintiff in error., Mr. Daniel E. Lynch for defendant in error.

Cases that cite this one

8 later published cases cite this decision.

de Baillet-Latour v. de Baillet-Latour (N.Y. 1950)
Bruno v. Bruno (New York Supreme Court 1972)
Schumer v. Schumer (New York Supreme Court 1954)
Richardson v. Richardson (New York Supreme Court 1951)
In re the Estate Blum (New York Surrogate's Court 1945)
Smith v. Foto (Mich. 1938)
Ward v. Ward (W. Va. 1934)
In re the Estate of Briggs (New York Surrogate's Court 1930)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam. Mr. Eugene Sweeney for plaintiff in error. Mr. Daniel E. Lynch for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed with costs, on the authority of Bell v. Bell, 181 U. S. 175 ; Streitwolf v. Streitwolf, 181 U. S. 179 ; Andrews v. Andrews, 188 U. S. 14.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.