Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of the United States, 1903

Winston v. Winston

Winston v. Winston
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided April 13, 1903
189 U.S. 506; 23 S. Ct. 852; 47 L. Ed. 922; 1903 U.S. LEXIS 1385 (United States Reports)

Winston v. Winston

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam. Mr. Eugene Sweeney for plaintiff in error. Mr. Daniel E. Lynch for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed with costs, on the authority of Bell v. Bell, 181 U. S. 175 ; Streitwolf v. Streitwolf, 181 U. S. 179 ; Andrews v. Andrews, 188 U. S. 14.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑