Supreme Court of the United States, 1903

Schulte v. Heman

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided April 20, 1903

189 U.S. 507; 23 S. Ct. 852; 47 L. Ed. 922; 1903 U.S. LEXIS 1387 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. William B. Thompson for plaintiffs in error., Mr. Hickman P.-Rodgers for defendant in error.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Reis v. MERTROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT (Mo. 1963)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs, on the authority of Shumate v. Heman, 181 U. S. 402; French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Company, 181 U. S. 324; Chadwick v. Kelly, 187 U. S. 540 ; Fallbrook Irrigation District v. Bradley, 164 U. S. 112. See Heman v. Schulte, 166 Missouri, 409.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.