Supreme Court of the United States, 1903

New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. McKeon

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided April 27, 1903 · No. 611

189 U.S. 508; 23 S. Ct. 853; 47 L. Ed. 922; 1903 U.S. LEXIS 1391 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Arthur M. Marsh for plaintiff in error., Mr. Stiles Judson, Jr., for defendant in error.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Norman v. State (Ga. 1930)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with *509costs and interest, on the authority of Wheeler v. New York etc. Railroad Company, 178 U. S. 321; New York and, New England Railroad Company v. Bristol, 151 U. S. 556; Arrowsmith v. Harmoning, 118 U. S. 194; Little Rock etc. Railway Company v. Worthen, 120 U. S. 97-102; Davidson v. New Orleans, 96 U. S. 97, 105. See 53 Atl. Rep. 656.

Mr. Arthur M. Marsh for plaintiff in error. Mr. Stiles Judson, Jr., for defendant in error.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.