Supreme Court of the United States, 1903

Woey Ho v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided November 9, 1903

191 U.S. 558; 48 L. Ed. 301; 24 S. Ct. 844; 1903 U.S. LEXIS 1399 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Franklin H. Mackey for appellant., The Attorney General and Mr. Assistant Attorney General McBeynolds for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Mackenzie v. Pease (7th Cir. 1906)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Lau Ow Bew v. United States, 144 U. S. 47, 58; Cross v. Burke, 146 U. S. 82, 88; In re Lennon, 150 U. S. 393; Perrine v. Slack, 164 U. S. 452; The Paquete Habana, 175 U. S. 677, 683.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.