Smith v. Payne
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Standard Rate and Data Service, Inc. v. United States Postal Service (D.C. Cir. 1978)
- State v. Standard Oil Co. of Louisiana (La. 1937)
- Smith v. Hitchcock (Supreme Court of the United States 1912)
- Smith v. Payne (D.C. Cir. 1903)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
SMITH
v.
PAYNE.
Supreme Court of United States.
Mr. Tracy L. Jeffords, with whom Mr. Charles F. Moody and Mr. E. Van Buren Getty were on the brief, for appellants.
*105 Mr. John G. Johnson and Mr. Henry H. Glassie, special assistants to the Attorney General, for appellee.[1]
MR. JUSTICE BROWN delivered the opinion of the court.
Plaintiffs are the publishers of several different series of novels under the names of The Columbia Library, The Bertha Clay Library, The Magnet Detective Library, The Medal Library, The Undine Library, The Eden Series, The Arrow Library, and some others. The books of these series are apparently of an inferior class of literature, and are numbered consecutively; but the only thing to indicate that they are issued periodically is a notice upon the outside of the back cover in small type that they are weekly or semi-monthly publications.
The considerations moving us to affirm the decree of the Court of Appeals in the case of Houghton v. Payne, just decided, apply with much greater persuasiveness to this case, and the decree dismissing the bill is, therefore
Affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and The CHIEF JUSTICE dissent in this case for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Houghton v. Payne, ante, p. 88, and Bates & Guild Co. v. Payne, post, p. 106.
NOTES
[1] For abstracts of arguments, see p. 88, ante
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.