Supreme Court of the United States, 1906

Congdon v. Michigan

Congdon v. Michigan
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 2, 1906
200 U.S. 612; 26 S. Ct. 753; 50 L. Ed. 619; 1906 U.S. LEXIS 1500 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Thomas J. Cavanaugh, Mr. H. T. Cook and Mr. Wm. G. Howard for plaintiff in error. Mr. David Anderson, Mr. ‘ John E. Bird, Mr. Russell M. Chase, Mr. Charles A. Blair and Mr. Henry E. Chase for defendants in error.

Congdon v. Michigan

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

*612In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Michigan.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173; Haseltine v. Bank, 183 U. S. 130.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.