Supreme Court of the United States, 1906

Russell v. Russell

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 15, 1906

200 U.S. 613; 26 S. Ct. 755; 50 L. Ed. 620; 1906 U.S. LEXIS 1503 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. John H. Hazelton and Mr. John G. Carlisle for appellant. Mr. Walter H. Bacon and Mr. Robert H. McCarter for ap-pellees.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Lovell v. Newman & Son (Supreme Court of the United States 1913)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Appeal from the United States Circuit Court *614of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted January 8, 1906. Decided January 15, 1906. Mr. John H. Hazelton and Mr. John G. Carlisle for appellant. Mr. Walter H. Bacon and Mr. Robert H. McCarter for ap-pellees. Per. Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Colorado Central Mining Company v. Turck, 150 U. S. 138; Press Publishing Company v. Monroe, 164 U. S. 105; Ex parte Jones, 164 U. S. 691; Continental National Bank v. Buford, 191 U. S. 119; Spencer v. Duplan Silk Company, 191 U. S. 526.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.