Supreme Court of the United States, 1906

Moeschen v. Tenement House Department of the New York

Moeschen v. Tenement House Department of the New York
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided November 12, 1906
203 U.S. 583; 27 S. Ct. 781; 51 L. Ed. 328; 1906 U.S. LEXIS 1642 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Adolph Bloch for plaintiff in error. Mr. Theodore Connoly for defendant in error.

Moeschen v. Tenement House Department of the New York

Cases that cite this one

16 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

In error to the Supreme Court of the State of New York.

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs. Boston Beer Company v. Massachusetts, 97 U. S. 25, 32; Powell v. Pennsylvania, 127 U. S. 678; United States v. Des Moines &c. Company, 142 U. S. 510, 544; Holden v. Hardy, 169 U. S. 366; Atkin v. Kansas, 191 U. S. 207; Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U. S. 11; Gardner v. Michigan, 199 U. S. 325; case below, 89 App. Div. 526; 179 N. Y. 325. And see Health Department v. Rector &c., 145 N. Y. 32; Harrington v. Board of Aldermen, *58420 R. I. 233; Commonwealth v. Roberts, 155 Massachusetts, 281.

Mr. Adolph Bloch for plaintiff in error. Mr. Theodore Connoly for defendant in error.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.