Supreme Court of the United States, 1906

Stuart v. Hauser

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided December 3, 1906

203 U.S. 585; 27 S. Ct. 783; 51 L. Ed. 328; 1906 U.S. LEXIS 1646 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. George B. Colby and Mr. Charles W. Dayton for plaintiff in error. Mr. S. M. Stockslager and Mr. W. E. Borah for defendants in error.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Barker v. Butte Consolidated Mining Co. (Supreme Court of the United States 1909)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Idaho.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Swafford v. Templeton, 185 U. S. 487; Butler v. Gage, 138 U. S. 52; Home for Incurables v. City of New York, 187 U. S. 155; Erie Railroad Company v. Purdy, 185 U. S. 148; Ansbro v. United States, 159 U. S. 695; Cornell v. Creen, 163 U. S. 75; Bausman v. Dixon, 173 U. S. 113; Gableman v. Peoria &c. Railway Company, 179 U. S. 335; City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Water Company, 142 U. S. 79; Beals v. Cone, 188 U. S. 184; Speed v. McCarthy, 181 U. S. 269. Case below, 9 Idaho, 53.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.