Supreme Court of the United States, 1908

Gaines v. Knecht

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided December 14, 1908 · Per Curiam

212 U.S. 561; 29 S. Ct. 688; 53 L. Ed. 652; 1908 U.S. LEXIS 1578 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. James L. Hopkins, Mr. Daniel W. Lindsey and Mr. Alfred, A. Eicks for plaintiff in error., Mr. Arthur E. Wallace for defendant in error.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Robertson v. United States ex rel. Baldwin Co. (D.C. Cir. 1923)
Baldwin Co. v. R. S. Howard Co. (Supreme Court of the United States 1921)
Moore, Commissioner of Patents, v. United States Ex Rel. Newcomb Motor Company (Supreme Court of the United States 1910)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Frasch v. Moore, 211 U. S. 1. See act of February 20,1905, for the registration of trade-marks, C. 592, 33 Stat. 724, §§ 9, 16, 17, 18, et passim.

[The headnote in Frasch v. Moore also appears as a note to Atkins v. Moore, ante, p. 285; and see ante, p. 290, for reference to point decided in Gaines v. Knecht.]

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.