Supreme Court of the United States, 1908

Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Lightheiser

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided December 7, 1908

212 U.S. 560; 29 S. Ct. 688; 53 L. Ed. 652; 1908 U.S. LEXIS 1576 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Stewart T. McConnell, Mr. Albert G. Jenkines, Mr. Bertram C. Jenkines and Mr. Charles H. Stuart for defendants in error in support of the motions., Mr. Allen Zollars and Mr. George E. Ross for plaintiff in error in opposition to the motions.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Easterling Lumber Co. v. Pierce (Miss. 1914)
Sonsmith v. Pere Marquette Railroad (Mich. 1912)
Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago, & St. Louis Railway v. Lightheiser (Supreme Court of the United States 1909)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

Writs of error severally dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Tullis v. Lake Erie & Western R. R. Co., 175 U. S. 348, and cases cited; Pittsburg &c. Ry. Co. v. Lightheiser, 168 Indiana, 438; Same v. Collins, 168 Indiana, 467; and Same v. Ross, 80 N. E. Rep. 845.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.