Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. United States
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- United States v. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Company, Mississippi Valley Barge Line Company v. United States Fo America (8th Cir. 1960)
- United States v. Hocking Valley Ry. Co. (District Court, N.D. Ohio 1911)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILWAY COMPANY, PETITIONER,
v.
UNITED STATES.
Supreme Court of United States.
Mr. Frank Hagerman, Mr. J.C. Cowin, Mr. A.R. Urion, Mr. Henry Veeder and Mr. M.W. Borders for petitioners.
The Attorney General, Mr. Milton D. Purdy, Assistant to the Attorney General, and Mr. A.S. Van Valkenburgh, United States Attorney, for the United States.
MR. JUSTICE DAY delivered the opinion of the court.
The counsel for the petitioner and the Solicitor General for the United States having filed a stipulation in writing in this cause, agreeing to abide the result of the Packing Company cases just decided (Nos. 467, 468, 469 and 470), it is hereby ordered that the judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals in this case be
Affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE MOODY took no part in the disposition of this case.
MR. JUSTICE BREWER'S dissent in Armour Packing Co. v. United States, ante, p. 56, applied also to this case.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.