Supreme Court of the United States, 1909

Rand, McNally & Co. v. Kentucky

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided November 1, 1909

215 U.S. 582; 30 S. Ct. 402; 54 L. Ed. 337; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1764 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Amos C. Miller and Mr. Wm. M. Beckner for plaintiffs in error., Mr. Frederick S. Tyler and Mr. James C. Sims for defendant in error.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Chanute v. Trader, 132 U. S. 210; Wilson v. North Carolina, 169 U. S. 586; Central Land Co. v. Laidley, 159 U. S. 103; Bacon v. Texas, 163 U. S. 207; Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; White v. Leovy, 134 U. S. 91; Electric Co. v. Dow, 166 U. S. 489; Pierce v. Somerset Railway, 171 U. S. 641; Shepard v. Barron, 194 U. S. 553; Rand, McNally & Co. v. Commonwealth, 106 S. W. Rep. 238; S. C., 108 S. W. Rep. 892, 32 Ky. Law Rep. 441, 1168; Commonwealth v. Ginn & Co., 111 Kentucky, 110.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.