Supreme Court of the United States, 1909

Kansas City Star Co. v. Julian

Kansas City Star Co. v. Julian
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided December 6, 1909 · Per Curiam
215 U.S. 589; 30 S. Ct. 406; 54 L. Ed. 340; 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1772 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Isaac N. Watson, Mr. Hannis Taylor, Mr. Wash. Adams and Mr. Frank Hagerman, for the plaintiff in error., Mr. John H. Atwood, Mr. O. H. Dean and Mr. Ira Julian, for the defendant in error.

Kansas City Star Co. v. Julian

Cases that cite this one

9 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Sayward v. Denny, 158 U. S. 180; Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. McGrew, 188 U. S. 291, 307, 308; State v. Bland, 186 *590 Missouri, 691, 701, Oxley Stave Co. v. Butler County, 166 U. S. 648, 653; case below, 209 Missouri, 35.

The attention of the state Supreme Court was not called to any Federal question until in the petition for rehearing, and that was too late. Loeber v. Schroeder, 149 U. S. 580 585; and cases.

The judgment rested on non-Federal grounds broad enough to sustain it. 209 Missouri, 35; Cincinnati Street Ry. Co. v. Snell, 193 U. S. 30; Hammond Packing Co. v. Arkansas, 212 U. S. 322.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.