Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /Supreme Court of the United States /

1909

235 Supreme Court of the United States opinions from 1909.

  • Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Sowers 213 U.S. 55, (1909)
  • Ex Parte: In the Matter of the Hudson Oil & Supply Company 214 U.S. 487, (1909)
  • Ex Parte: In the Matter of Frank McWilliams 214 U.S. 488, (1909)
  • United States v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad 212 U.S. 509, (1909)
  • Toy Toy v. Hopkins 212 U.S. 542, (1909)
  • United States v. Marvin 212 U.S. 275, (1909)
  • Thomas v. Texas 212 U.S. 278, (1909)
  • Johnson v. Mueser 212 U.S. 283, (1909)
  • E. C. Atkins & Co. v. Moore 212 U.S. 285, (1909)
  • Laurel Oil & Gas Co. v. Morrison 212 U.S. 291, (1909)
  • Juragua Iron Co. v. United States 212 U.S. 297, (1909)
  • American Express Co. v. Mullins 212 U.S. 311, (1909)
  • Nielsen v. Oregon 212 U.S. 315, (1909)
  • Hammond Packing Co. v. Arkansas 212 U.S. 322, (1909)
  • The Folmina 212 U.S. 354, (1909)
  • Fritzlen v. Boatmen's Bank 212 U.S. 364, (1909)
  • Matter of Dunn 212 U.S. 374, (1909)
  • Bradford v. Morrison 212 U.S. 389, (1909)
  • Harten v. Löffler 212 U.S. 397, (1909)
  • Railroad Commission v. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. 212 U.S. 414, (1909)
  • McDaniel v. Traylor 212 U.S. 428, (1909)
  • Greenameyer v. Coate 212 U.S. 434, (1909)
  • Frederic L. Grant Shoe Co. v. W. M. Laird Co. 212 U.S. 445, (1909)
  • Carino v. Insular Government of Philippine Islands 212 U.S. 449, (1909)
  • Santos v. Holy Roman Catholic and Apostolic Church, Tambobong Parish 212 U.S. 463, (1909)
  • The Eugene F. Moran 212 U.S. 466, (1909)
  • Bagley v. General Fire Extinguisher Co. 212 U.S. 477, (1909)
  • New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. United States 212 U.S. 481, (1909)
  • New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. United States 212 U.S. 500, (1909)
  • Mullan v. United States 212 U.S. 516, (1909)
  • American Express Co. v. United States 212 U.S. 522, (1909)
  • Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Bourman 212 U.S. 536, (1909)
  • Ex Parte: In the Matter of the Dowagiac Manufacturing Company 212 U.S. 569, (1909)
  • H. v. Mercer, Trustees, Etc. v. Monitor Drill Company 212 U.S. 590, (1909)
  • Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Calhoun 213 U.S. 1, (1909)
  • Davidson Bros. Marble Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Gibson 213 U.S. 10, (1909)
  • Martinez v. La Asociacion De Senoras Damas Del Santo Asilo De Ponce 213 U.S. 20, (1909)
  • Valdes v. Munich 212 U.S. 568, (1909)
  • Notley v. Brown 212 U.S. 570, (1909)
  • Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Stock Yards Co. 212 U.S. 132, (1909)
  • Ontario Land Co. v. Yordy 212 U.S. 152, (1909)
  • Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Deselms 212 U.S. 159, (1909)
  • Crawford v. United States 212 U.S. 183, (1909)
  • Spreckels v. Brown 212 U.S. 208, (1909)
  • Standard Oil Co. v. Anderson 212 U.S. 215, (1909)
  • Continental Wall Paper Co. v. Louis Voight & Sons Co. 212 U.S. 227, (1909)
  • Converse v. Minnesota Thresher Mfg. Co 212 U.S. 567, (1909)
  • Ramon Valdes, in Error v. Ventura Munich Ramon Valdes, in Error v. O. M. Wood Ramon Valdes, in Error v. Maria Venega Perianes 212 U.S. 568, (1909)
  • Goon Shung v. United States 212 U.S. 566, (1909)
  • Spokane Valley Land & Water Co. v. Madson 212 U.S. 565, (1909)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑