Supreme Court of the United States, 1910

Wenar v. Jones

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided April 25, 1910 · No. 143

217 U.S. 593; 30 S. Ct. 694; 54 L. Ed. 896; 1910 U.S. LEXIS 1990 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Willis Sweet for appellant., Mr. Paul Fuller and Mr. Howard Thayer Kingsbury for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

8 later published cases cite this decision.

Basora v. Padilla (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico 1943)
Basora v. Padilla (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico 1943)
Negrón v. Mudafor (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico 1934)
Negrón v. Mudafor (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico 1934)
Marxuach v. Aguilar (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico 1914)
Marxuach v. Aguilar (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico 1914)
Cautiño v. Muñoz (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico 1913)
Joseph Wenar v. William A. Jones, Bishop of Porto Rico (Supreme Court of the United States 1910)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Harrington v. Holler,1 111 U. S. 796, and cases cited.

The headnote in this case is as follows:

A decision of the Supreme Court of a Territory dismissing a writ of error to a District Court because of failure to docket the cause in time is not a final judgment or decision within the meaning of the statutes regarding writs of error and appeals to this court: Mandamus is the proper remedy in such case.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.