Supreme Court of the United States, 1910

Schultz v. Diehl

Schultz v. Diehl
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided April 25, 1910 · Per Curiam
217 U.S. 594; 30 S. Ct. 694; 54 L. Ed. 896; 1910 U.S. LEXIS 1991 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Charles W. Fulton and Mr. Douglas W. Bailey for appellants., No appearance for appellees.

Schultz v. Diehl

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Decree reversed with costs and cause remanded to be proceeded in according to law. Jellenik v. Huron Copper Mining Company, 177 U. S. 1; 18 Stat. 470, c. 137, § 8; Code of Oregon, §§ 5064, 300, 301.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.