Ex Parte Leaf Tobacco Board of Trade of New York
Cases that cite this one
53 later published cases cite this decision. The 23 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Morris v. Farmers Insurance Exchange (Wyo. 1989)
- People of the State of California v. United States (9th Cir. 1950)
- United States v. Seigel (D.C. Cir. 1948)
- United States v. Norman Stoerr (3d Cir. 2012)
- Telecom Italia S.P.A. v. L-3 Communications Corp. (10th Cir. 2009)
- Microsystems Software, Inc. v. Scandinavia Online AB (1st Cir. 2000)
- Warner Bros. Inc., J. Joseph Bainton, Esquire v. Dae Rim Trading, Inc., and Yun Yon Cho (2d Cir. 1989)
- Carlene Bense v. Richard Starling and Anthony Duchinski (7th Cir. 1983)
- Cities Service Co. v. Department of Energy (Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals 1983)
- Jagdish Rai Chadha v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (9th Cir. 1981)
- Jeremiah Taylor v. Ouachita Parish School Board v. Jimmy Andrews, Monroe City School Board, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant (5th Cir. 1981)
- Pennsylvania v. Rizzo (3d Cir. 1976)
- First Iowa Hydro Electric Cooperative v. Iowa-Illinois Gas And Electric Company (1st Cir. 1957)
- First Iowa Hydro Electric Cooperative v. Iowa-Illinois Gas & Electric Co. (8th Cir. 1957)
- Pyle-National Co. v. Amos (7th Cir. 1949)
- Gross v. Missouri & A. Ry. Co. (United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas 1947)
- Mackey v. City of Little Rock (8th Cir. 1938)
- State of Washington v. United States (9th Cir. 1936)
- Rose v. Bank of America, Nat. Trust & Savings Ass'n (9th Cir. 1936)
- In re 211 East Delaware Place Bldg. Corp. (District Court, N.D. Illinois 1936)
- State v. United States (9th Cir. 1936)
- United States v. Houde Engineering Corp. (District Court, W.D. New York 1935)
- Demulso Corporation v. Tretolite Co. (10th Cir. 1934)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Leave to file petition denied.
1. One who is not a party to a record and judgment is not entitled to appeal therefrom. Bayard v. Lombard, 9 How. 530; Indiana v. Liverpool, London & Globe Ins. Co., 109 U. S. 168; Ex parte Cockroft, 104 U. S. 578.
2. The action of the court below in refusing to permit the movers to become parties to the record is not susceptible of being reviewed by this court on appeal, or indirectly, under the circumstances here disclosed, by the writ of mandamus. In re Cutting, 94 U. S. 15, and see Credits Commutation Co. v. United States, 177 U. S. 311.
3. The merely general nature and character of the interest which the movers allege they háve in the papers here filed is not in any event of such a character as to authorize them in this proceeding to assail the action of the court below. This is more obvious in this case since the act of the court which is assailed has been accepted by those who are parties to the record. United States v. Union Pacific R. R. Co., 105 U. S. 262; Elwell v. Fosdick, 134 U. S. 500.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.