Supreme Court of the United States, 1912

Gleason v. Wood

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided May 13, 1912 · Lamar

224 U.S. 679; 32 S. Ct. 571; 56 L. Ed. 947; 1912 U.S. LEXIS 2335 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Willard L. Sturdevant and Mr. David C. McCurtain, with whom Mr. Edward P. Hill was bn the brief, for plaintiffs in error., Mr. Charles West, Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma, for defendants in error.

Cases that cite this one

10 later published cases cite this decision.

Bryan County, Okl. v. United States (10th Cir. 1941)
Board of Com'rs of Creek Co. v. Bartlett (Okla. 1920)
United States v. Board of Com'rs (District Court, D. South Dakota 1939)
Wynn v. Fugate (Okla. 1931)
In re Gross Production Tax of Wolverine Oil Co. (Okla. 1915)
Rider v. Helms (Okla. 1915)
Cobb v. Board of Com'rs of Seminole County (Okla. 1915)
Marcy v. Board of Commissioners of Seminole County (Okla. 1914)
United States v. Board of Com'rs (United States District Court, Oklahoma Eastern 1921)
Whitmire v. Trapp (Okla. 1912)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Mr. Justice Lamar

delivered the opinion of the court.

The complaint alleges that the plaintiffs are Choctaws owning homesteads and surplus granted under the terms of the Atoka Agreement. Their applications to enjoin the officers of the State of Oklahoma from assessing their lands for taxation for the year 1909 was denied. All of the *680 questions involved are disposed of by the decision in Choate v. Trapp, ante, p. 665. The judgment, therefore, is reversed and the case remanded with directions for further proceedings not inconsistent with that opinion.

Reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.