Supreme Court of the United States, 1914

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Poetker

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Poetker
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 26, 1914
235 U.S. 683; 35 S. Ct. 201 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Charles Martindale for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Frank S. Roby and Mr.-Ward H. Watson for the defendant in error.

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Poetker

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of *684(1) First National Bank v. Estherville, 215 U. S. 341, 346; Rogers v. Clark Iron Co., 217 U. S. 589; May v. Illinois, 232 U. S. 720; (2) McCorquodale v. Texas, 211 U. S. 432, 437; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry., 228 U. S. 326, 334; City of Lewiston v. Chamberlain, 234 U. S. 751.

Mr. Charles Martindale for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Frank S. Roby and Mr.-Ward H. Watson for the defendant in error.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.