Supreme Court of the United States, 1914

Atlantic Transport Co. of W. Va. v. Maryland Ex Rel. Szczesek

Atlantic Transport Co. of W. Va. v. Maryland Ex Rel. Szczesek
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided May 25, 1914 · Hughes
234 U.S. 63; 34 S. Ct. 736; 58 L. Ed. 1213; 1914 U.S. LEXIS 1185 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Edward Duffy, with whom Mr. Nicholas P. Bond and Mr. Ralph Robinson were on the brief, for petitioner., Mr.' W. H. Price, Jr., and Mr. John E: Semmes, Jr., with whom Mr. John E. Semmes, Mr. Jesse N. Bowen and Mr. Matthew Gault were on the brief, for respondent.

Atlantic Transport Co. of W. Va. v. Maryland Ex Rel. Szczesek

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Mr. Justice Hughes

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a libel filed on behalf of the widow and infant children of Martin Szczesek to recover damages for injuries resulting in his death. Szczesek was a stevedore in the employ of the Atlantic Transport Company, the petitioner, and was engaged in loading the ship Pretoria. The District Court allowed a recovery against the petitioner (190 Fed. Rep. 240) which the Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed. 193 Fed. Rep. 1019.

The questions presented are the same as those which were considered in Atlantic Transport Company v. Imbrovek, ante, p. 52, decided this day and, for the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the decree is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.