Henry E. Meeker, Surviving Partner, Etc. v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Spiller v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. (Supreme Court of the United States 1920)
- Union Pacific Railroad v. Board of County Commissioners (Supreme Court of the United States 1918)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
234 U.S. 749
34 S.Ct. 674
HENRY E. MEEKER, Surviving Partner, etc., Petitioner,
v.
LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY.
No. 1000.
HENRY E. MEEKER, Petitioner,
v.
LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY.
No. 1001.
Supreme Court of the United States
April 13, 1914
Mr. Wm. A. Glasgow, Jr., for petitioner.
No counsel appeared for respondent.
Per Curiam:
Petitions granted, upon the authority of § 262 of the Judicial Code [36 Stat. at L. 1162, chap. 231, U. S. Comp. Stat. Supp. 1911, p. 235]. Re Chetwood, 165 U. S. 443, 462, 41 L. ed. 782, 788, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 385; Whitney v. Dick, 202 U. S. 132, 50 L. ed. 963, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 584; McClellan v. Carland, 217 U. S. 268, 54 L. ed. 762, 30 Sup. Ct. Rep. 501; United States v. Beatty, 232 U. S. 463, 467, 58 L. ed.——, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 392.
Mr. Joseph W. Folk and Mr. C. W. Needham, by leave of court, filed a brief herein in behalf of the Interstate Commerce Commission.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.