Bergdoll v. Harrigan

Supreme Court of the United States April 26, 1915

Bergdoll v. Harrigan, 238 U.S. 609 (1915)

35 S. Ct. 663; 59 L. Ed. 1487; 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1398

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs, upon the authority of rule 6, clause 5; Micas v. Williams, 104 U. S. 556; The Alaska, 130 U. S. 201; Chanute City v. Trader, 132 U. S. 210, 214; Northern *610Pacific Railroad v. Amato, 144 U. S. 465, 473, and cause remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

Mr. Joseph Gilfillan and Mr. George S. Graham for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Joseph W. Catharine for the defendant in error.

Reference

Full Case Name: Erwin R. Bergdoll, in Error v. Frank A. Harrigan, Trustee, etc.
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published