Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of the United States, 1915

Bergdoll v. Harrigan

Bergdoll v. Harrigan
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided April 26, 1915
238 U.S. 609; 35 S. Ct. 663; 59 L. Ed. 1487; 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1398 (United States Reports)

Bergdoll v. Harrigan

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs, upon the authority of rule 6, clause 5; Micas v. Williams, 104 U. S. 556; The Alaska, 130 U. S. 201; Chanute City v. Trader, 132 U. S. 210, 214; Northern *610Pacific Railroad v. Amato, 144 U. S. 465, 473, and cause remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

Mr. Joseph Gilfillan and Mr. George S. Graham for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Joseph W. Catharine for the defendant in error.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑