Supreme Court of the United States, 1915

Mutual Film Co. v. Industrial Commission of Ohio

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided February 23, 1915 · McKenna

236 U.S. 247; 35 S. Ct. 393; 59 L. Ed. 561; 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1756 (United States Reports)

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

Eureka Productions, Inc. v. Lehman (District Court, S.D. New York 1936)
Commercial Pictures Corp. v. Board of Regents (N.Y. 1953)
MATTER OF JOSEPH BURSTYN, INC. v. Wilson (N.Y. 1951)
Pathe Exchange, Inc. v. Cobb (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1922)
Gaylord v. City of Pasadena (Cal. 1917)
Mutual Film Corp. v. City of Chicago (7th Cir. 1915)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Mr. Justice McKenna

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case, was submitted with. No. 456, just decided. In the latter case the complainant in the court below and appellant here was a corporation of Virginia. The appellant. in the pending case is a corporation of dhio, and counsel say “although there are some differences in the way in which their business is conducted, yet the questions involved are the same, the records in both cases are nearly identical,, and the court below treated them together, rendering the one opinion to cover both.” And counsel have submitted them on the same argument.

On the authority, therefore, of thé opinion in No. 456, the decree is

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.