Supreme Court of the United States, 1916

Daeche v. Bollschweiler

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided February 21, 1916

241 U.S. 641; 36 S. Ct. 446; 60 L. Ed. 1217; 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1373 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Merritt Lane, Mr. John W. Ockford and Mr. Otto F. Seggel for the appellant. The Attorney General and The Solicitor General for the appellee.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Fay v. Crozer, 217 U. S. 455; Hannis Distilling Co. v. Baltimore, 216 U. S. 285, 288; Hendricks v. United States, 223 U. S. 178, 184; (2) Benson v. Henkel, 198 U. S. 1, 10-11; Pierce v. Creecy, 210 U. S. 387, 401-402; (3) Glasgow v. Moyer, 225 U. S. 420; Johnson v. Hoy, 227 U. S. 245; Henry v. Henkel, 235 U. S. 219.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.