Daeche v. Bollschweiler

Supreme Court of the United States February 21, 1916

Daeche v. Bollschweiler, 241 U.S. 641 (1916)

36 S. Ct. 446; 60 L. Ed. 1217; 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1373

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Fay v. Crozer, 217 U. S. 455; Hannis Distilling Co. v. Baltimore, 216 U. S. 285, 288; Hendricks v. United States, 223 U. S. 178, 184; (2) Benson v. Henkel, 198 U. S. 1, 10-11; Pierce v. Creecy, 210 U. S. 387, 401-402; (3) Glasgow v. Moyer, 225 U. S. 420; Johnson v. Hoy, 227 U. S. 245; Henry v. Henkel, 235 U. S. 219.

Reference

Full Case Name: Paul Daeche v. Albert Bollschweiler, United States Marshal, etc.
Status: Published