Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of the United States, 1916

Daeche v. Bollschweiler

Daeche v. Bollschweiler
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided February 21, 1916
241 U.S. 641; 36 S. Ct. 446; 60 L. Ed. 1217; 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1373 (United States Reports)

Daeche v. Bollschweiler

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Fay v. Crozer, 217 U. S. 455; Hannis Distilling Co. v. Baltimore, 216 U. S. 285, 288; Hendricks v. United States, 223 U. S. 178, 184; (2) Benson v. Henkel, 198 U. S. 1, 10-11; Pierce v. Creecy, 210 U. S. 387, 401-402; (3) Glasgow v. Moyer, 225 U. S. 420; Johnson v. Hoy, 227 U. S. 245; Henry v. Henkel, 235 U. S. 219.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑