Seekatz v. Medina Valley Irrigation Co.

Supreme Court of the United States March 20, 1916

Seekatz v. Medina Valley Irrigation Co., 241 U.S. 646 (1916)

36 S. Ct. 451

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 137; Easterling Lumber Co. v. Pierce, 235 U. S. 380; (2) Mississippi & Red River Boom Co. v. Patterson, 98 U. S. 403; Madisonville Traction Co. v. St. Bernard Mining Co., 196 *647U. S. 239; Mason City &c. Railroad v. Boynton, 204 U. S. 570; (3) Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. v. Chicago, 166 U. S. 226, 244-245; Bauman v. Ross, 167 U. S. 548, 593; Backus v. Fort Street Depot Co., 169 U. S. 557, 569; (4) Fallbrook Irrigation District v. Bradley, 164 U. S. 112; Hairston v. Danville & Western Ry., 208 U. S. 598; O’Neill v. Leamer, 239 U. S. 244, 253-254.

Mr. C. L. Bass, Mr. T. T. VanderHoeven and Mr. Joseph W. Bailey for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Floyd McGown for the defendant in error.

Reference

Full Case Name: F. P. Seekatz, in Error v. The Medina Valley Irrigation Company
Status: Published