Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

United Railways Co. of St. Louis v. City of St. Louis

Supreme Court of the United States
United Railways Co. of St. Louis v. City of St. Louis, 241 U.S. 647 (1916)

United Railways Co. of St. Louis v. City of St. Louis

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Holden Land Co. v. Inter-State Trading Co., 233 U. S. 536, 541; Mellon Co. v. Mc*648Cafferty, 239 U. S. 134; (2) Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Parker v. McLain, 237 U. S. 469, 471; Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14; (3) Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co., 220 U. S. 61, 78; Chicago Dock Co. v. Fraley, 228 U. S. 680; Denver v. New York Trust Co., 229 U. S. 123, 143; St. Louis &c. Ry. Co. v. Arkansas ex rel. Norwood, 235 U. S. 350, 366.

No. 366. No. 368. No. 369. No. 370. No. 371. No. 372.In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Missouri.Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Mr. Henry S. Priest for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Truman P. Young and Mr. Charles H. Danes for the defendant in error.

Reference

Full Case Name
United Railways Company of St. Louis, in Error v. The City of St. Louis St. Louis & Suburban Railway Company, in Error v. The City of St. Louis United Railways Company of St. Louis, in Error v. The City of St. Louis United Railways Company of St. Louis, in Error v. The City of St. Louis United Railways Company of St. Louis. in Error v. The City of St. Louis United Railways Company of St. Louis, in Error v. The City of St. Louis, and St. Louis Transit Company, in Error v. The City of St. Louis
Status
Published
↑