Supreme Court of the United States, 1916

Filler v. Steele

Filler v. Steele
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided April 10, 1916
241 U.S. 648; 36 S. Ct. 550; 60 L. Ed. 1220; 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1383 (United States Reports)

Filler v. Steele

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of: (1) Ex parte Parks, 93 U. S. 18, 21; Tinsley v. Anderson, 171 U. S. 101, 105; Frank v. Mangum, 237 U. S. 309, 326; (2) Allen v. Georgia, 166 U. S. 138, 140; Felts v. Murphy, 201 U. S. 123, 129; Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U. S. 78; Jordan v. Massachusetts, 225 U. S. 167; (3) Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry., 228 U. S. *649596, 600; Overton v. Oklahoma, 235 U. S. 31; Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14.

Mr. Ralph D. Hurst and Mr. Thomas H. Greevy for the appellant. Mr. C. Ward Eicher, Mr. George E. Barron and Mr. Cecil E. Heller for the appellee.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.