Supreme Court of the United States, 1916

Lincoln v. Power

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided May 1, 1916

241 U.S. 651; 36 S. Ct. 721 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. John Neville Boyle and Mr. Addison S. Pratt for the appellant. The Attorney General and Mr. Charles\ Fox for the appellees."

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

In re the Extradition of Koskotas (District Court, D. Massachusetts 1989)
United States v. Mackin (2d Cir. 1981)
Sindona v. Grant (2d Cir. 1980)
Ignatius Timothy Tribich Lincoln v. James M. Power, Marshal, Etc (Supreme Court of the United States 1916)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of (1) In re Luis Oteiza y Cortes, 136 U. S. 330, 334; Ornelas v. Ruiz, 161 U. S. 502, 508; *652Bryant v. The United States, 167 U. S. 104, 105; Terlinden v. Ames, 184 U. S. 270, 278; Elias v. Ramirez, 215 U. S. 398, 406-407; McNamara v. Henkel, 226 U. S. 520, 523; (2) David Kauffman & Sons Co. v. Smith, 216 U. S. 610; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580; Manila Investment Co. v. Trammell, 239 U. S. 31.

Mr. John Neville Boyle and Mr. Addison S. Pratt for the appellant. The Attorney General and Mr. Charles" Fox for the appellees.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.