Supreme Court of the United States, 1916

First National Bank v. Kehnast

First National Bank v. Kehnast
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided May 22, 1916 · No. 333
241 U.S. 654; 36 S. Ct. 724; 60 L. Ed. 1223; 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1390 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Robert Newbegin and Mr. Henry Newbegin for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Tellis T. Shaw, Mr. Harold W. Fraser, Mr. Henry B. Harris and Mr. E. J. Marshall for the defendants in error.

First National Bank v. Kehnast

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Chemical National Bank v. City Bank of Portage, 160 U. S. 646; Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Mellon v. McCafferty, 239 U. S. 134. (2) Leather Manufacturers’ Bank v. Cooper, 120 U. S. 778, 781; Whittemore v. Amoskeag National Bank, 134 U. S. 527; Petri v. Commercial National Bank of Chicago, 142 U. S. 644; Hermann v. Edwards, 238 U. S. 107.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.