Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of the United States, 1916

Christopher v. Mungen

Christopher v. Mungen
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 23, 1916
242 U.S. 611; 37 S. Ct. 18; 61 L. Ed. 526; 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1405 (United States Reports)

Christopher v. Mungen

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Gaar, Scott & Co. v. Shannon, 223 U. S. 468, 470; Mellon v. McCafferty, 239 U. S. 134; (2) Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 105; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Parker v. McLain, 237 U. S. 469. Mr. George C. Bedell for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Nathan P. Bryan and Mr. J. T. G. Crawford for the defendants in error.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑